Threat Intelligence

Tracking the France Riots: How Telegram Became the Coordination Layer

During the 2023 French riots, Telegram channels became the primary coordination tool. Here's what OSINT monitoring revealed in real time.

DigitalStakeout · · 2 min read

When riots erupted across France in late June 2023 following the police shooting of 17-year-old Nahel M. in Nanterre, Telegram became the primary coordination platform. While mainstream media reported on the destruction, the operational coordination — where to gather, where police were deployed, which targets to hit next — played out in Telegram channels in real time.

For security teams with operations, personnel, or assets in France, the difference between monitoring Telegram and not monitoring Telegram was the difference between advance warning and surprise.

Why Telegram, Not Twitter

The riots highlighted a shift in how civil unrest coordinates digitally.

Traditional social media platforms — X/Twitter, Facebook, Instagram — served as broadcast channels. Participants posted videos, photos, and commentary about what had already happened. The content was retrospective and performance-oriented.

Telegram served a different function entirely. Channels and groups were used for real-time tactical coordination: meetup locations, police movement reports, target selection, and logistics. The platform’s encryption, group management features, and lax content moderation made it the operational layer that other platforms couldn’t provide.

What the Channels Showed

Monitoring Telegram channels during the riots revealed patterns that weren’t visible from traditional media coverage alone.

Geographic targeting. Specific channels focused on specific cities and neighborhoods. Before a new area experienced unrest, channels discussed it as a potential target — providing a window of advance warning for security teams monitoring those areas.

Escalation signals. The language in channels shifted from grievance expression to operational planning in observable stages. Monitoring for that shift — from “this is wrong” to “here’s where we go tonight” — provided early indicators of when unrest would intensify.

Counter-police intelligence. Channels shared real-time reports of police deployments, roadblocks, and response patterns. This information, intended for rioters, was equally valuable for security teams trying to understand the security environment in specific areas.

The OSINT Monitoring Challenge

Monitoring Telegram during a fast-moving crisis presents specific challenges.

Volume spikes. Channels that normally produce a few dozen messages per day can generate thousands during a crisis. Without automated classification, the signal gets buried in noise.

Language complexity. The France riots generated content primarily in French, with heavy use of slang, abbreviations, and coded language. Monitoring tools that only process English miss the majority of actionable intelligence.

Ephemeral content. Some channels use auto-delete timers. Messages that appeared at 10 PM may be gone by midnight. Continuous monitoring with archival capability is necessary to maintain an intelligence record.

Channel discovery. New channels are created rapidly during crisis events. A monitoring setup configured before the event will miss channels that emerge during it. The ability to discover and ingest new channels in real time is a critical capability.

Lessons for Security Teams

Telegram monitoring isn’t optional for civil unrest. If your threat monitoring doesn’t include Telegram, you have a fundamental coverage gap for any event involving civil unrest, protest activity, or organized disruption.

Multi-language processing matters. Global events generate intelligence in local languages. The France riots reinforced that an English-only monitoring capability misses the operational content that matters most.

Automated classification preserves analyst capacity. During high-volume crisis events, human analysts can’t read every message. AI classification that separates actionable operational intelligence from general commentary is what makes real-time monitoring usable.

Archive everything. Post-event analysis requires a record of what was said, when, and in which channels. If your monitoring doesn’t archive, your post-event analysis will have gaps.

DigitalStakeout monitors Telegram channels alongside social media, dark web forums, and news sources — with AI classification across 14 risk domains including Physical Security, Public Safety, and Societal Risk. Multi-language processing ensures that intelligence generated in French, Arabic, Spanish, or any of 40+ languages is classified and surfaced alongside English-language content.


See how DigitalStakeout monitors emerging civil unrest. View the platform or get a demo.

DigitalStakeout classifies signals across 16 risk domains with 249+ threat classifiers — automatically, in real time.